SlideSource Library · Feature

Approval workflows and audit trails for scientific presentation content

Capture who approved what, when, and why.

SlideSource Library routes scientific content through the reviews your organization requires and records every decision, so teams can see how content was approved and produce that history on demand.

SlideSource Library approval workflow and audit trail
The problem

Approvals that can’t be reconstructed

When sign-off happens over email and chat, no one can later say with confidence who approved a slide, when, or on what basis. That is exactly the question that matters most when content is challenged.

  • Sign-off scattered across email
  • No record of who approved
  • Unclear what was actually reviewed
  • Approvals that quietly expire
SlideSource Library audit trail of approval decisions
A complete record

The decision trail, captured automatically

Every approval records the reviewer, the timing, and the comments behind the decision, so the history of how a slide was reviewed is captured as part of the work, not reconstructed after the fact.

What you get

Review that mirrors how committees decide

A configurable path from review to sign-off to a complete, reproducible record, built around how scientific, medical, legal, and regulatory committees actually work.

  1. 1

    Configurable review types

    Define the review you need (Scientific, Medical, Legal, Regulatory, or SME) to mirror how your committees actually decide.

  2. 2

    Multi-reviewer sign-off

    Route content to the right reviewers and capture each sign-off, so approval reflects the people who actually reviewed it.

  3. 3

    Comments and decision history

    Capture who approved what, when, and with what comments: a complete record on every decision.

  4. 4

    Lifecycle review

    Review and expiration cycles per content type, with escalating alerts before evidence goes stale.

An example

A typical review path

Configure the chain your committees actually use, for example:

  • Scientific
  • Medical
  • Legal / Regulatory
  • Final
Built to flex

How the workflow flexes to real review

Conditional approvals

Require specialized review only when it’s warranted, so routine content isn’t bottlenecked while sensitive content gets the right eyes.

Delegation

Approvals route to a backup automatically when a reviewer is out, so nothing stalls because someone is at a congress.

Multi-reviewer (N-of-M) groups

Require all, or a defined quorum, of a review group to sign off, mirroring how committees actually decide.

Who it helps

Approval that works for everyone in the chain

Medical, Legal & Regulatory reviewers

Sign off in a defined chain, with your decision and comments captured on the record.

Scientific Communications

Move content through review without losing track of where it is or what’s blocking it.

Compliance

Reconstruct who approved what, when, and on what basis, on demand.

FAQ

Common questions

What kinds of review can SlideSource Library support?

Approval workflows are configurable for Scientific, Medical, Legal, Regulatory, and SME review, so the process can mirror how your committees decide.

Does SlideSource Library keep an audit trail?

Yes. Every decision captures who approved what, when, and with what comments, producing a complete and reproducible record of how content was reviewed.

How does lifecycle review work?

Content types can carry review and expiration cycles, with escalating alerts before material goes stale, so approvals don’t silently age out of date.

See approval workflows in action

Schedule a walkthrough of configurable review types, multi-reviewer sign-off, and the audit trail behind every decision.